Washington, D.C.—at its quarterly meeting today, the Millennium
Challenge Corporation’s Board of Directors selected Lesotho as eligible to
develop a proposal for a new compact. The Board also reselected five countries
to continue developing compacts and two countries to continue developing
Threshold Programs. The Board selected
Lesotho because it has consistently demonstrated a clear commitment to
democratic governance and sound policies. A new compact with Lesotho offers
MCC the opportunity to have a significant impact on reducing poverty and
creating economic growth in the country. “Throughout the development and
implementation of its first compact, Lesotho has been a strong MCC partner,”
MCC CEO Daniel W. Yohannes said. “We look forward to continuing this strong
partnership and helping the Basotho people create a more prosperous future.”
Lesotho successfully completed a five-year, $363 million MCC compact in
September 2013 that helped expand water supply for household and industrial
use, strengthened the country’s health care system and removed barriers to
foreign and local private sector investment. The Government of Lesotho
demonstrated a strong commitment to the compact, and will have spent $50
million of its own money to complete construction and fund complementary
investments. Through the compact, MCC also supported the passage of landmark
legislation that empowered Basotho women by ending the second-class status of
married women and granting spouses equal rights. The Board generally decides
each December whether to select new compact and Threshold Partner countries,
and whether to reselect those previously selected countries that are currently
developing proposals for MCC investments. By law, the Board must consider three
factors when selecting countries with which MCC will seek to enter into a
compact: the extent to which a country meets or exceeds eligibility criteria,
the opportunity to reduce poverty and generate economic growth in the country
and the availability of funding.
MCC’s
annual scorecards, which rely on third-party
data to measure a country’s commitment
to ruling justly, investing in its
people and encouraging economic freedom, represent the best available
individual measurements of policy performance. When choosing or reselecting
partner countries, the Board also considers supplemental information to assess
issues or recent events that may not have been captured by the scorecards.
After careful consideration of previously selected countries’ performance, the
Board reselected Ghana, Liberia, Morocco, Niger, and Tanzania as eligible to
continue development of their respective compact proposals. The Board expressed
strong concern that two of the countries, Liberia and Morocco, passed only nine
indicators in their latest scorecards. The Board indicated it expects Liberia
and Morocco to pass the scorecard before approving a compact with either
country.Two other countries currently developing compact proposals, Benin and Sierra Leone, were not reselected. The Board discussed the fact that those two countries did not pass MCC’s control of corruption indicator, which is a hard hurdle for passing the scorecard, and did not put them up for a vote on reselection. After also reviewing supplemental information on anti-corruption efforts in Benin and Sierra Leone, the Board urged continued but limited engagement with both countries and indicated it expects both countries to pass the control of corruption indicator before it would approve a compact with them. “We are very concerned when a country does not pass the control of corruption indicator,” Yohannes said. “We recognize the efforts that the governments of Benin and Sierra Leone have undertaken to address corruption, and I can assure them that MCC is committed to helping those efforts succeed. I am hopeful that the continued and deepened efforts of both countries will be reflected in future performance on the control of corruption indicator. ” The Board is committed to further discussions about the agency’s selection process and criteria. The Board also reselected Guatemala and Nepal as eligible to continue developing Threshold Programs.
The failure of the Sierra Leone government to meet the requirement of good governance and fight against corruption of MCC shows clearly how cosmetic some of government’s trumpeted transformational agenda is; and the sizeable gap between the lofty rhetoric about social justice, prosperity and reality.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen